SeeMore Corona Del Mar FGP

I get emails from time to time asking me if SeeMore putters are truly as good as I say they are. It is a tad frustrating since there’s no way for me to prove SeeMore’s superiority or, for that matter, the superiority of any other product I have ever used.

Some things simply need to be learned first hand.

Still, what I have done is to come to see the SeeMore FGP as a tool rather than a mere golf club. Do you know how it is to reach for the exact tool that you need? Maybe it’s a #00 Phillips head screwdriver. If you reach for that but end up with a #2 Phillips you’re not going to get that screw tightened (or loosened, as the case may be). But, if you need the #00 and that’s what ends up in your hand, your job just got a lot easier. That’s the best way to extol the virtues of the SeeMore FGP. Whenever I reach for it, I know I’m reaching for the right tool for the job.

A while back I was looking at the SeeMore website and I saw their new SeeMore Corona Del Mar FGP and I simply loved the finish. I wasn’t too sure about the TPU insert but I knew I wanted to try it to find out if the folks at SeeMore had found a way to make a superb tool even more effective.

DSC_0917

Yes, this is a very good looking putter for sure.

DSC_0918

The TPU insert is milled similarly to the rest of the putter’s face which adds a little extra visual impact.

It’s all good news since the Corona Del Mar shares its visual profile at address with my trusty vintage FGP.

DSC_0921

One interesting difference between these two SeeMores is the internal profile of the head. You can easily see what I’m describing in the next two photos.

DSC_0926

DSC_0927

The internal profile of the Corona Del Mar is obviously squared off where the original FGP has a nearly round profile behind the face. I’ve been trying to decide which would be better in an absolute sense. The newer putter obviously puts a lot more mass behind the ball whereas the original FGP distributes what mass it has toward the top and bottom of the face. You can also see that Corona Del Mar has some added mass on heel and toe of the sole that the older FGP lacks. I asked Jim Grundberg of SeeMore about this and he said that the lighter weight of the TPU insert allowed them to move some mass around relative to the original FGP. The head weight on original FGPs averages around 335 grams while the Coronna Del Mar tips the scales to right around 355 grams.

Many of you will know that my original FGP was a purchase of sheer luck. I had been putting abysmally for quite some time and I needed a change from the Anser-style putter I had favored for many years. In rooting through the used putter barrel I came across a well-worn FGP. The bad news was that the old SeeMore grip had split with age and was slicker than slick. The good news was that it was very, very inexpensive. I took the time to read up on what I call the SeeMore method and put the FGP directly into my bag. I’ve never looked back. The question at hand is how well the Corona Del Mar measures up.

My initial concerns were these:

Does the TPU insert change the putter’s sound or feel relative to the original brass FGP? 

Do the rest of the Corona Del Mar’s materials change the putter’s mass and balance?

First, the TPU: It feels great and sounds far better than I expected. The Corona Del Mar has  a somewhat more crisp sound and feel at impact.

I like it. The putter feels smooth but lively.

This lively feel of the Corona Del Mar is offset by what I believe (I’m too lazy to weigh them) is greater head weight and probably greater swing weight than the FGP. The combination makes the Corona Del Mar especially well suited to the kind of faster greens I play on in the summer months.

The Corona Del Mar is an easy putter to control and pretty much every putt feels as if it’s been struck solidly.

DSC_0923

DSC_0921

I wouldn’t be much of a reviewer if I failed to come up with even a single complaint. The lower painted section of the older FGP is painted a matte black which the corresponding section on the Corona Del Mar is slightly glossy. Initially I convinced myself that the glossy paint could cause glare in bright sunlight but upon my first round under the Southern California sun I found this problem to be nonexistent. On a happy note, though, SeeMore does now offer this section painted in a variety of different colors if you’re more into color than I am. Me? I like basic black.

There are very few classic, timeless golf clubs. There are even fewer golf clubs that approach an ideal of concept and utility. SeeMore FGP models accomplish both of these rare feats. I congratulate everyone at SeeMore for recognizing the brilliance of the FGP design and all of the ways that it can consistently benefit golfers, whether they play on the PGA Tour or their local muny.  The SeeMore Corona Del Mar is truly a worthy successor to the original FGP. It’s easy for me to recommend SeeMore to everyone who wants to improve their putting. SeeMore gives players both a proven technique and a proven product. If you use a SeeMore putter the way it was designed you will make more putts.

It’s that simple so get out there and start making more putts.

 

 

SeeMore Corona Del Mar FGP

SeeMore Triangulator Review

There isn’t a putter on the planet who is immune from problems with aim. And, let’s face it, if you don’t know exactly where you’re aimed knowing exactly how much a putts breaks and having the speed of a putt perfectly judged still means a missed putt.

Break varies…

Speed varies…

But, the ability to aim your putter blade precisely at the hole is a skill anyone can develop.

The SeeMore Triangulator will help.

Let’s be clear. The SeeMore Triangulator is simple and it’s brilliant. Its use is totally intuitive. You simply pick something to aim at (I started out in my living room). Then, you set up your putter and aim at the target. Now comes the part when you’ll need an assitant. While holding your putter blade in the alignment that shows where you’re aimed, your assistant will place the Triangulator against your putter plade and then pull the white string toward the target, thereby showing where you’re actually aimed. Voila!

Well, almost voila…

If your set up and tendency for alignment is consistent you’ll see that you consistently aim right or left. This may be related to your eyes being inside, directly over the ball or even a tad outside your line at address. But, no matter how you set up to the ball, as long as you do it consistently, you should see a pattern to your aim that the Triangulator will help you to correct.

It’s no secret that I’m a true believer in SeeMore putters. Ever since I began using them I see more putts (sorry) fall into the hole. The Triangulator is the perfect tool to help you develop the ability to aim your putter blade right where you want it, rather than where you only think you want it.

So, for less than the price of a sleeve of premium balls you can have something light enough and small enough to store in your golf bag that will keep your aim sharp and the putts falling.

Buy one today. You’ll be surprised to learn where you’re truly aiming and pretty soon you’ll end up making more putts!

The SeeMore Triangulator

 

SeeMore Triangulator Review

Golf’s Major Championships

US Open: Tour players are seldom embarrassed and I enjoy it when the USGA’s motive over four days is to do just that. A little humility is a good thing especially when you’re driving courtesy cars every week. I find must-make par putts far more interesting than a procession of makable putts for birdie and eagle.

The Open Championship: The R&A doesn’t have the same flair for penal setups as the USGA and their rota is a bit tiring. Still, I love the spectacle, the weather and the galleries. Bring on the wind and rain, preferably both at the same time.

The Masters: As much as I admire Bobby Jones, I despise the patrician and elitist nature of Augusta National. But, the back 9 is an amazingly good theater every year. If I had been Rickie Fowler and some AN clown told me to turn my hat around I would have told him to pack sand.

The PGA Championship: The PGA has no identity. It’s just another event that’s called a major. Many of the courses are ho-hum and so are a lot of the winners. I think they should make it back into a match play event but the potential loss of TV money means that will never happen. They could have two days of stroke play and take the top guys and play 18 hole matches on Saturday and have a 36 hole championship match just to maximize the suffering.

Golf’s Major Championships

The Glorious Art of the Backyard Flop Shot

This happens every few family get togethers, usually in my brother in law Dave’s backyard, and it’s fantastic in its subtle variety and fundamental consistency.

Dave, must, at some point, peer out of window that opens into his backyard.

He sees me and his son Andy, marking out a shot. There’s a (real) golf ball on the ground and a 60 degree sand wedge on the scene.

A cold chill slides down Dave’s spine…

Andy and I can play, so there’s little chance of breakage.

Plus, we’re hitting a doable shot.

“I’m thinking just short of the bird feeder. If it clears the lawn border it’s OB.”

“Got it, I’m in…you go first.”

“Gotta give me a tough lie.”

Andy settles in after putting the ball in a low spot of turf. It’s not an easy lie, but it’s not impossible either.

He takes the 60 back and catches the ball just a little heavy. But, the slight miss-hit works great; the ball hits short and bounds toward the target, stopping within three feet.

I shake my head. “I can’t beat that one.”

The wedge is unfamiliar in my hand and the lie is dicey. I’m not sure where to land the ball and how it might release. I, too, catch the big ball before the little ball but my shot lands at the target line before hopping over the OB boundary.

“Tough bounce,” says Andy.

Now we move the target further across the yard and we leave ourselves a tricky side hill lie from inconsistent turf.

We both walk forward to get a look at what the landing area around the hole looks like, trying to gauge whether the ball will release or hold.

Andy goes first. He makes better contact this time, too good in fact, and the ball runs well past the hole.

Ah, an opening!

I settle in, now getting a feel for the 60 and the shot. I catch the ball perfectly. It hits the up slope and grabs four feet right of the target.

Even!

Andy looks across the yard.

“OK, big boy shot. Mandatory flop and it has to stop short of the OB and closest to the line of the bird feeder.”

“Yeow, tough one…show me, stud.”

Andy perches his ball in the fluffy grass until the lie looks like the type that will allow an open-faced wedge to slide under the ball and loft it into the air before it lands with all of the forward momentum of a sand bag tossed by a four-year old girl.

He takes a huge swing. If he were to hit the ball flush it would fly well over ninety yards but here Andy was trying to make the ball fly no further than thirty feet.

He strikes the ball with near perfection. There’s no sound of impact, just the slicing of the club through the damp spring grass and the subtle foof sound of the grass being caught between the club face and the ball.

The ball stops three feet from the bird feeder!

I think to myself, you can hit this shot, but I know I can’t or at least I won’t.

I decide to up the difficulty rating by giving myself a thin lie, the kind of lie poor players fear…the kind of lie that demands perfect impact. I open the face of the 60 and take a decent swing, but I lacked the courage to bring the club into the ball with the kind of authority that would cause the ball to travel a lesser distance than many people would believe possible. The result is a semi-flop that never gains full elevation and thuds harmlessly into the ivy.

“You da man, Andis.”

About then, Tom and John emerge from the slider. They’re ready to join the game and me and Andy encourage them to take a turn at the shots.

This gets Dave’s attention immediately. In his yard were twin retirees holding golf clubs but what he saw was a pair of identical seven year olds playing with matches surrounded by dry grass. He had to make his move quickly.

He came into the yard smiling the smile of a man who could imagine a battle scarred Titleist driven through a window or into the forehead of the retired municipal court judge who lived next door and likes to enjoy his back porch swing on just this kind of perfect spring afternoon.

“John can hit this shot,” Tom said confidently.

John stepped forward, examining the wedge and the balls for signs of imperfection that could spoil the expert precision of the coming shot.

He raked the ball into a clean lie and swung.

It was a toed and screeched hard right, catching the edge of the swimming pool. The old ball yawned into a high arching flight before splashing into the middle of the pool.

John was undeterred. “Bad lie,” he muttered.

Dave’s desperation crept into his voice. “Hey, let’s try that shot again but let’s use one of these old tennis balls!” He stood there while his dog leaped excitedly in anticipation of a rousing game of fetch.

By then, John was back over the ball. He had never heard a word Dave said.

Andy and I wisely stepped to the rear. Barring the most amazing bounce, we were determined not to wind up as collateral damage in Dave’s backyard.

John was taking dead aim now. Harvey Penick would be proud.

Andy couldn’t resist. “Dad, your BBQ is a goner!”

As Dave held up the tennis ball John lashed at the ball and caught it squarely. The ball whistled past the bird feeder and missed the glimmering BBQ by mere inches.

Now Tom and John are taking turns taking practice swings while the family dog darts between them. Only their feckless swings and amazing canine reflexes prevent disaster.

“Now it’s my turn,” says Tom.

Andy and I step back another step trying to triangulate the path a cruel but perfect mishit could create. We call for the dog and hold on to her as Tom takes his shot.

The club face is shut at address and there can only be one result. The ball is bladed and hurtles toward the chain link fence. It nails the fence post dead center and streaks back at the hapless Tom, catching him right on the shin.

“Nice,” says John.

No one goes to see if Tom is OK but he limps back toward the ping pong table under his own power so all must be well.

But now the juices are flowing now; blood has been shed.

Andy looks at me and says, “One full swing…8-iron?”

I nod. “Do it!”

Seconds later Andy’s got his father’s 8-iron and is it aiming up the steep hill behind his parent’s house.

“Think you can get to the ridge?”

“Don’t think so…”

John’s got his phone out by now and is wondering how far the nearest houses are.

No way he’s worried… he’s just curious.

Dave’s calmer now. He knows Andy won’t hit it sideways and he knows the houses past the ridge line are well out of reach.

Still, though, there’s a glorious moment of dread and fascination as all of Andy’s six foot three inch frame lashes at the ball.

The ball is pured and it soars on the penetrating flight only a fine player can create.

It streaks effortlessly toward the ridge line as we all wonder where it will land.

 

 

The Glorious Art of the Backyard Flop Shot

What’s the Best Spiced Rum?

Rums, like Old Fashioneds, are making a comeback.

I’ve sampled quite a few of them and I’d like to share my experiences.

Best Overall:

This is going to rattle a lot of cages but I find Captain Morgan Private Stock to be the best all around rum. It is well balanced, stands up well to ice and mixes superbly. I prefer a sweeter rum, but not so sweet that it’s sugary. The taste of this rum is deep and complex with a long, perfect finish. It costs a bit more than I like to pay, but I’d have to say that it’s worth it.

So Good, Yet So Cheap:

I’m not a big fan of Bacardi rums but their Black Rum is really quite good. It has a somewhat heavier presentation, though Bacardi calls in a medium rum. It starts and finishes strongly and has a lot of caramel and licorice both in scent and flavor. It’s a great mix with Diet Coke.

Nearly Great, But Pricey:

Sugar Island is a bold rum at 92 proof but it is very smooth and sugary in the extreme. The spice is minimal but the overall sense of sweetness rules. Its fullness almost reminds me of the finish of a good port. Even though I enjoy this rum, I’m not sure that it’s worth the hefty tariff. Plus, it’s made in California which maybe OK for wines but just doesn’t seem right for a spiced rum.

Another 90 Proof Winner:

I actually prefer a 70 proof rum for mixing, though some have a tough time stating up to melting ice and whatever it’s being mixed with. 90 proof rums almost always sacrifice smoothness for a strong start, finish and depth of flavor. 90 proof spiced rums frequently lack spice flavors. One exception is Sailor Jerry which tips the scale at 92 proof but is an marvelously spiced rum with distinct vanilla, nutmeg and a nice cinnamon flavor. I’ve noticed the price on Jerry drop of late which makes it an even tastier proposition.

My Daily Favorite:

Captain Morgan simply cannot be beat for the money and it never disappoints. Yes, I like to try and frequently enjoy other spiced rums but if the original captain was the only spiced rum in the world, I would shed no tears. This is a balanced spiced rum. This is a smooth spiced rum with plenty of flavor. This is a rum you can sip or mix. This, in the end, is the spiced rum all of the pretenders are trying to be.

Liquid Licorice is Not a Spiced Rum:

Kraken rum has an overpowering taste of licorice, rather than flavors of actual spices. This must be cheap and easy way to make a rum that, to the uninitiated, might come across and dark and bold. Dark it is, bold it’s not. It’s passable, but with all of the other fine rums on hand why bother?

A Poor Rum from a Great Company:

I have no idea how a great rum distiller like Bacardi can sell a rum as bad as their Oak heart. It has a spineless and astringent quality that lingers even when it’s mixed. Sipped, it is nothing short of abysmal. One can only hope that Bacardi takes a beating on this and goes back to the drawing board and comes up with something worth drinking. If this was the only spiced rum on the market, I wouldn’t drink spiced rum ever again.

A Promising New Kid:

Well, not exactly a new kid but certainly a new rum from a solid company. I came across Cannon Blast with its distinctive, hard to carry (though easy to roll, if that’s your thing) cannonball shaped bottle. Yes, it’s an idiotic name. There’s no way around that. But, it’s a delightful spiced rum with an initial hit of lime that’s followed up by a smooth, warm spiciness that is near perfect when mixed. The folks at Captain Morgan obviously take this stuff very seriously, that’s for sure. I cannot imagine another rum distillery with the guts or creativity that a rum like this took to create.

 

 

 

What’s the Best Spiced Rum?

A Kinder, Gentler Naysayer

It’s been a while since I’ve posted anything about optimism. My golf game has been marginal so it’s been hard to generate much optimism about that.

That, however, is another story.

I’ll just say it: My oldest friend is a naysayer who never says nay, at least not straight out.

It’s sad…

The odd thing is that even though I’ve known the guy for something like five decades I would have never described him as typically pessimistic, until now. In fact, I’m the cynical one. I’m the one who sees corruption everywhere. I’m the one who is always suspect of motives. I’m the one who views all bureaucracies as evil.

But, that’s yet another story.

My old friend is a kinder and gentler kind of naysayer. I’m going to outline but three examples and you’ll have to take my word that these are among the more mild examples I could discuss. The really juicy examples are simply too personal to blog about.

Internet anonymity only goes so far.

Nay Say #1

I’ll start with the most minor example. I was telling my buddy about a young administrative assistant who worked with me last year. He’s a real nice guy and very bright. That said, he’s kind of stuck in his 20s with not a lot of big ideas about what to do with his life. Sound familiar? Anyway, the kid came to me one day with this idea to blog about The Internet of Things. I thought this was dandy idea. This is a kid who aspires to write, but doesn’t actually write all that much. A blog would give him an easy way to focus his energy on something and to develop his own writer’s voice.

Great, right?

Here’s what my buddy said. “Really…what qualifies him to write about that?”

At the time I didn’t make it much of the issue other than to point out that the whole purpose of a blog was simply to express opinion. That’s all the kid wanted to do; express an opinion about something that was interesting to him. The idea struck me as totally harmless and maybe helpful to the kid, if no one else.

Nay Say #2

I’ve been writing and editing since I was in high school though neither has ever been my profession. Still since I hit my 40s I’ve taken my work more seriously. I’ve edited one golf book, written one of my own and co-written another much longer book. In between I’ve written more than a hundred essays and reviews and published and vanity-printed a short story. One day I told my buddy that I was writing a golf novella. He expressed what can only be described as mildly good-humored interest before saying cheerfully, “Hey, you should take a creative writing class at UCLA!”

Happily, I chose not to render him unconscious, though it was my genuine first impulse. I thought to myself, I’m a 54-year-old writer who has to date achieved little in the way of sales or financial reward. But, at the same time I have also never spoken to my friend about any creative struggles I’ve had with my work. On the contrary, I’ve only told him about my enthusiasm for my projects and even about my wish that we might work on something together. So what justified his take that I should go to school where someone who knew what they were doing could tell me how little I knew about what I was doing?

Nay Say #3

One day I was telling my buddy about another friend of mine who builds spec houses for a living. I showed him a photo of one of the beautiful mountain houses my friend is building and mentioned offhand that he designs his homes himself. My buddy’s comeback? “Oh, is a licensed architect?” This time I did bristle a bit. I told him that he wasn’t and who gives a crap? This guy has designed and built scores of high end custom spec houses and has been a residential developer for the last three decades. This was the point where the my friends’ particular brand of nay saying finally started to get the better of me.

The kid at work who wants to blog about The Internet of Things wouldn’t give a shit about what my buddy thinks about his qualifications. I care even less about the fact that my friend thinks it would be a grand idea for me to take a creative writing course. And, my friend who builds spec houses would surely laugh at the question about whether he’s a licensed architect or not.

The simple and common reason we don’t give a collective shit is because we’re too busy giving a bigger shit about our projects. Our only regret is that we don’t have enough time to give our projects the attention we think they deserve.

What all of this really got me around to thinking about is whether being around even a gentle nay sayers helps or hurts? In the case of the guy I’m writing about I can say with complete assurance that his nay saying is far more damaging to him than it is to anyone else. Still, it does make me wonder if what he says could have a creeping negative effect on my confidence.

Let’s face it; even the most accomplished writers can be subject to the occasional bout of a fragile ego. Writers like me do all of their work confident in the fact that no one will ever read their work and if by some cosmic accident anyone ever did they would certain to hate it. With that comforting thought in mind, maybe it’s not so great to have that kind of negative buzz in your head when you’re taking on a challenging project.

I love my nay saying friend, but I hate the thoughtless and lazy negativity that seems to so wholly possess him.

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”

This quote from TR is taped to the side of my monitor. It’s taped there for at least three reasons: First, it makes me nostalgic for a time, a time before my own, when a president would and could speak publicly with such erudition and sophistication. Second, it encourages me to temper (occasionally) my criticisms of the work of others. Third, it emboldens me to stay in the arena and not to allow myself to be content with being a mere spectator.

I’m quite certain my friend has heard or read this quote. And, I’m sure that in his heart he doesn’t see himself as a relentless nay sayer, yet he is. The challenge for my friend and for me, and for everyone, is to rip those great words from the page and bring them out into the real world in the form of action.

I know what my friend will say to all of this: I will consider it.

I will consider it; the feeble mantra of the nay sayer.

A Kinder, Gentler Naysayer

Reaching my golf potential with Jim Venetos: Book Three

196 toward Crystalaire
165 toward Crystalaire

I turned to Jim Venetos about the same time his internet star began to rise. I am glad about this. It’s great to watch someone have his turn at success after much toil. There’s never been an overnight success that actually came about overnight and I am sure Venetos could tell a tale or two about the amount of work he’s put into his own game and the games of his legion of students.

If you’re not a reader, I will cut to the chase here. I have moved on from what I will call the Venetos Method. There is great validity to many elements of his method, but also some troubling issues at least for a player of my limited ability. In the end, I can see the value of a quieter lower body but not in the goal of absolute stillness. Worse (again, for me) is the requirement of setting up with the shoulders closed with a great deal of weight loaded onto the front side. Combined, these two aspects of the Venetos swing almost put my game out of action this season.

First, the closed shoulders stressed my lower and middle back in a way my golf swing had never stressed those parts of my body. Second, the weight left coupled with the goal of keeping weight there brought about an episode of plantar faciitis the like of which I have not suffered in 20 years. This result may be a coincidence but I rather doubt it. Loading the front side of the body while mass (comprised of the arms and club at least) goes rearward is very difficult to do without some painful tweakage. It took my left foot no less than two months to heal and even now it’s still a bit tender.

During my lessons, Venetos was big on saying that his method negates the need for rhythm, tempo and timing. I was always surprised at his use of these terms (since I never had mentioned them). But, the more he mentioned them over time the more I reflected on two simple facts. The first is that when I have played my best golf my swing felt possessed of rhythm, tempo and some element of timing. The second fact is that a swing, as a kind of arc, takes place across a given area of space and over a given period of time. The length of the arc can be measured from a number of different points; the hand’s arc travel a lesser distance than the club head, for example. To put it simply, no matter what, tempo always matters (again, at least to my game). I admit that it can be an amorphous and difficult issue to train, but it’s still an inevitable and irreplaceable part of every athletic process I can think of. To contend it doesn’t matter is dubious at best.

It’s odd to me that the rhythm, tempo and timing thing became such a big deal to me after I had taken my final lesson with Jim Venetos. It came me on day when I was playing quite well after a day that found me playing horribly. One day everything was a blur (except for the ball coming off the face) and the next day all was nearly languid (yet the ball flew with snap and authority).

What was different? Many things, perhaps. But, to me, to the golfer writing down his score, the difference was in the meter and pace of my swing.

Years ago, there was an internet video that showed a bunch of players doing their imitations of different tour players and even of their own buddies. What was funny was that their imitation swings looked just like their actual swings.

Consider this example number 48 of feel isn’t always real.

Point taken (my own, ironically enough), but in the end, we have to be sensitive to the pace of our swings, especially when we don’t play or practice as much as we would like. How many rounds are ruined by the rush and fractured tempo that comes from a last minute dash from the car to the first tee? The doomed swing isn’t really so very different but its fundamental tempo is MIA.

Now, my swing mantras are these: Pace, posture and poise. Pace addresses my need to balance the speed of my back swing relative to the speed of my forward swing. When I play well, their paces feel as though they match and it doesn’t matter if I’m hitting a drive or a putt.

Since my flexibility is only slightly better than a rod made of glass, it’s not easy for me to maintain my posture; I have been known to come out of my posture on putts, for God’s sake.

Poise goes back to that coaches of coaches, John Wooden. He prized players with poise. When I make a swing I covet the poise that comes in the form of the kind of balance that can be seen and felt over the entirety of an athletic movement.

A golf swing, even my golf swing, is an athletic movement. It starts, moves and finishes in a given space and over a given time. The idea of ignoring at least a sense of that time is anathema to me.

I have gone back to go forward. Looking back got me looking at the writing of Harvey Penick and his advice to practice swinging the club with your eyes closed. Doing this makes me acutely aware of how my swing is and is not balanced and paced. I have also gone back to the most influential golf book I have ever read, Nick Price’s, The Swing. This book was my golf-bible many years ago and I now wonder why I ever set it aside. If you’ve never read it, read it…

Let there be no doubt that I admire and like Jim Venetos. If he ever called me up to have a beer, I’d be there and the first round would be on me. But, I am fundamentally unable to make his swing work for my body and my game, and that’s all that counts when it comes to grading the validity of a swing technique or method; it’s simply my only measure of relevance.

Still, I don’t regret the time and effort I spent working on Venetos Method or the money I spent on my lessons with him; both were well spent in my opinion. Golf is a game of endless realizations. That essential nature make some people take up bowling. The truth is that I have stared hard into the abyss of giving up the game more than once over the last year or two. Of that fact, I am neither proud nor ashamed. All I can do is continue to strive, and that’s something I know Jim Venetos will encourage.

Reaching my golf potential with Jim Venetos: Book Three

Xero Amuri Z-Trek Sport Sandals Review

I reached an epiphany a while back when I realized how badly my feet had been weakened by wearing the kinds of shoes I wore and by walking the way I did (very fast and with a great deal of heel strike).

The first thing I did was to fight the instinct to pretty much always wear shoes, even when I’m inside. Within only a few days my feet (and especially my toes) felt better, stronger and more flexible.

The next thing I did was to look for a shoe that would allow as much of this feeling as possible when I’m outside on hard surfaces. It didn’t take long for me to find Xero. Whether this is because the Xero brand is so popular or whether it’s because shoes minimalist shoes like theirs are so unpopular I cannot say.

My eye went directly to their new Z-Trek Sport Sandal. My thought was that the Xero could take over from my Birkenstocks which pretty much represent the opposite philosophy when it comes to designing shoes that are good for the feet. In fact, the Birkenstock website goes so far as to advise people suffering from Plantar Fasciitis (like me) to avoid walking barefoot.

Contradictory advice is seldom helpful…

The Xero shoe philosophy is simple. A shoe should protect the bottom of the foot from unkind surfaces while allowing it to flex and function as in as close to a barefoot way as possible. To accomplish this Xero uses a 5mm thick rubber sole that feels a little like a Michelin. The Sport sandals are not especially light and it’s mostly the density of the rubber that’s used that accounts for their mass.

ZeroThe webbing used for the straps is very high quality and smooth feeling on the skin. I find that the webbing used by some other sandal companies (Teva) to be quite harsh feeling. A video on the Xero website advises adjusting the straps somewhat loose and that’s what I did. I’m getting a little bit of lateral foot movement but looser feels better than tighter with my Xeros so far.

Before they arrived, I was a little concerned that the Xeros might look a little too goofy but they actually look just fine up close and personal. I am compelled that Xero uses something like a heel cup. It causes a slight amount of pressure at the back inside of my heel but my guess is they elected to use it to promote just a smidge of stability in the heel area.

Walking in the Xeros is indeed pretty much like walking barefoot. Still, the rubber sole is excellent when it comes to insulation from radiant heat, like the heat that rises from a San Fernando Valley parking lot when it’s 100 degrees. More than anything, I find the Xeros to be instructive, just like walking barefoot.

Both barefoot walking and walking in the Xeros teach us how to walk in a way that minimizes heel strike and that’s a very good thing. The Xeros make me wonder where the practice of raising the heel of a shoe came from? Was it for the sake of the stylishness of the shoe or the vanity of the wearer? I still own some shoes with a bit of padding and a bit of heel lift but I am convinced that my feet will be healthier the more time I spend in the Xeros.

Talk about money well spent…

I have to admit that I love small companies like Xero. They saw a need for a product, refined it as well as they could, and brought it to the market.

I am very glad they did.

Xero Amuri Z-Trek Sport Sandals Review

Treating and preventing plantar fasciitis

For those who have never dealt with it, let me assure you that plantar fasciitis is a very annoying malady. I’ve had it twice, once about a decade ago and again over the last few weeks. When you have it, you just want it to go away. There’s nothing like foot (and back) pain when it comes to making pretty much your entire life difficult. It’s the kind of discomfort that’s perfectly suited to taking the fun out of even the most enjoyable activities.

The first time I had it, I was gleefully ignorant about questions regarding the causes of plantar fasciitis. Now, the questions about cause and prevention are very keen to me. The most simplistic explanations tend to point to improper (unsupportive) shoes and the need for proper arch support and maybe even orthotics. The more thought-provoking information contends that plantar fasciitis is actually caused by the weakening of the foot and that this weakening is caused by overly supportive shoes and the excess heel striking they encourage.

As an aside, I should say that my current battle with plantar fasciitis came after playing golf with minimalist golf shoes. Still, I’ve now come to see those shoes as less of the cause of my discomfort and more the things that pushed the progressive weakening of my feet into the fore. Two of the more interesting contentions from what I’ll call the unconventional plantar fasciitis information sources are these:

1) That arch supports don’t actually support the foot’s arch, they only serve to limit circulation to the area and weaken it. The logical foundation for this argument is the fact that structural arches do not derive their support from their centers but rather from the end, which would be the ball and heel of the foot.

2) That a lack of flexibility in the toes (particularly the big toe) contributes to plantar fasciitis. It’s said that the big toe should have 80 degrees of extension. This allows the toe to extend when the foot strides forward. But, when this kind of full extension is impossible (mine extends less than 50 degrees) it causes an excessive load to the root of the plantar arch and causes the foot to twist during the stride.

Putting these two contentions together brought me to the belief that my feet had suffered a cumulative injury. I could sense this before I had the informational ammunition to support the opinion. My feet just always felt squished into shoes and I had lost the ability to walk barefoot without feeling like I was putting my feet at risk.

It’s easy to conclude that regaining the strength and flexibility of my feet, toes and ankles are a priority. So far, I have done as much barefoot walking as possible, even at work and especially once I’m at home. I am also doing twice or three times daily massage of the rear of my foot using balls of various hardness (from golf balls to tennis balls).

I’ve also sought to walk more lightly and with less heel strike. That’s a big challenge because I tend to walk fast and I spend most of my time on very hard and frequently slick surfaces. It’s a all very much a work in progress but I am optimistic.

By the way, I have found both of these sites to be invaluable:

A physical therapy website with a great treatment guide for plantar pain sufferers.

An excellent video explaining the role of big toe flexibility in plantar pain.

Treating and preventing plantar fasciitis

The Scars of Sergio Garcia

I’ve followed Sergio Garcia since he won the British am and contended in the US am. To me, he’s a very compelling if sometimes confounding player (and person?) to watch.

After The Players someone asked Garcia how he liked playing in that arena. Garcia was vague in reply but made it clear there had been some heckling and went on to say that it’s worse when he’s in contention. It was clear that it was not a subject he was comfortable discussing and he ended the interview rather abruptly.

That got me thinking about the source of Garcia’s off and on relationship with galleries. From 1997 until the 1999 PGA there was none of that; he was the eyes-closed darling of the fans and the media.

But then…

Looking back, here’s what I think soured things:

—The 1999 Ryder Cup at The Country Club. 16 years later no one will deny that the galleries were brutal to the European players. I’m sure this got to Garcia more than many of the older players. He played his own stupid-kid card when he sat down in the middle of the fairway to show that he wouldn’t be rushed.

—The 2002 US Open at Bethpage and the Garcia re-grip epidemic. Again, I’ve never heard anything but that the galleries really zeroed in on Garcia.

—Garcia is relentlessly European. He’s never lived in Texas like K.J. Choi and likely never will. In 2014 he played in 16 events on the PGA Tour and 17 on the European Tour. Though it’s likely not helped his game or increased his shot at a bagging a major, he’s remained loyal to his continent and tour.

From 1997 to 1999 Garcia seemed on the verge of embracing the US. He learned English very quickly and did interviews without translators as soon as he thought he was able to pull it off. Now, I’ll bet Garcia wished he had never learned to speak much English, like Angel Cabrera.

I used to think Garcia had been beaten down by his place in the Tiger Woods Era, but now I don’t think that’s it. I think the US fans beat him down. Surely he has deserved some of it, but much of it was a simple case of grinding a guy for the sake of grinding him.

It would be unfortunate if Garcia became the successor to Colin Montgomerie. I’ve followed both players in person and I can tell you that I never saw Garcia do anything but keep his head down and play his game. Monty on the other hand quite nearly seemed to be looking for a confrontation. It was weird; Monty acted like he was under attack when he wasn’t. When I looked at Monty the word jerk came to mind. Garcia doesn’t look like a jerk to me. And, he always seems very well liked by other players, true, most of them are Euros, but the ability to get along is the ability to get along. In that way, Garcia can do something that Patrick Reed and Bubba Watson can’t.

In the end, I didn’t think Garcia would win The Players. He had lost his inner Spaniard somewhere. And, there were too many ghosts floating above the 17th green, and the lingering image of his ball coming up short against Woods, for him to go flag hunting like Fowler and Kisner. In a odd way, it was almost as if even the announcers found a way to dig at Garcia, with Dan Hicks mimicking Garcia’s accent and Miller opining that Garcia looked like he needed a siesta as Garcia watched Kisner’s putt on the 72nd hole.

That, was not something Garcia brought on himself. Hicks and Miller did that all by themselves and they may not even be aware of it.

I hope Garcia finds whatever it is he has lost before too many more pages of the calender get turned.

The Scars of Sergio Garcia